Loves! Happy Humpday to you, my fabulous people.
I know I forced you to endure my opinion about menu transparency last night, but I have one more thing to talk about. I’m sorry! I just can’t hold it in. I promise celebrity tabloid lovin’, MAC Makeup obsessed, high-heel touting KD will be back tomorrow. You don’t mind anyway, do you?
I didn’t think so!
Every morning when I get to work, I briefly check CNN for nothing more than major headlines. It’s a quick two seconds and helps me feel in touch with the world until I can read the articles at leisure on my own time. Generally, the text of the article doesn’t tell me much more than the headline (Isn’t that funny?!?) except for when it comes to health-related articles. Instead, health-related pieces tend to elaborate in ways that are not only confusing, but often seem contradictory to something else I just read.
Frankly, I’m SICK OF IT. And, here’s why.
Today’s example will focus on this article. If you don’t want to read the entire thing, here’s the KD synopsis: Too much sugar in one’s diet is bad for overall health. Try not to be blown away by this news.
I have so many issues with this article that I’m not quite sure where to begin.
[Spinning around, closing eyes and picking random point Pin-The-Tail-On-The-Donkey style].
How about here: “The study, to be published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, highlights a trend some nutritionists consider disturbing: In recent years, the typical American’s diet has increasingly incorporated added sugars. The authors defined them as ‘caloric sweeteners used by the food industry and consumers as ingredients in processed or prepared foods to increase the desirability of those foods’.”
What the heck does this even mean? Better yet, how does it help people like you & I? After reading that, I am now informed that I probably eat too much sugar and it’s not all my fault because the food industry is dumping sugar into foods I eat. While that might help to identify the problem, it does not help to identify the culprit (never mind a solution).
This is America, people! Asking our society to “just say no” to any and all processed foods is just ludicrous. To solve our problems, we have to be realistic! It’s not good enough to tell people that processed foods have added sugar. (DUH! Of course they do!) Instead, we need an article that not only discusses processed foods having too much sugar, but also easy swaps at the grocery store to help curb the problem.
I’ve discussed my love of the NuVal concept before and this article only reinforces the need for these types of ratings in our day-to-day life. It’s so crucial to elaborate on articles such as this one. People need to SEE which manufactures are the biggest culprits. Of course, I don’t know any by heart without doing the research, but I would almost guarantee that certain companies are bigger “sugar offenders” than others. These “studies” should not only focus on the overall problem of processed foods, but also on calling out these corporations. If these types of specifics were given, people may tend to stray from certain products.
And then there’s this: “Data from the mid-1990s show that 15.8 percent of the typical American’s diet was composed of added sugar — 21.4 teaspoons or 359 calories per day. That’s up from 10.6 percent in 1977-1978. Added sugars have been linked to obesity, diabetes and tooth decay.”
Mm hmm. So, if I’m reading that correctly, these folks are relying on data from the MID-1990’S. You want to know how old I was in 1995? Twelve. TWELVE! I think it’s safe to say that A LOT has changed since 1995. If the sugar problem was “up” at that time, one can only begin to fathom what it is now.
Let’s continue because this is my favorite part:
“The researchers studied 6,113 adults enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Interviewers called them and asked what they had eaten the previous day, then estimated the total added sugar in each person’s diet.
Participants were then separated into groups: Those who got less than 5 percent of total calories from added sugar; 5 percent to less than 10 percent; 10 percent to less than 17.5 percent; 17.5 percent to less than 25 percent; and 25 percent or more.
Those in the highest-consuming added sugar group eat about 46 teaspoons of added sugar per day, the study said. Those who consumed more added sugar tended to be younger, non-Latino blacks with low income, it said.”
As previously mentioned, this information is WAY too vague to hold any weight! It does not mention where these people are from or what the average age is. In addition, it simply says participants were asked what they ate the day before. It’s pretty clear that a large amount of them ate too much sugar on the questioned day. But, are there any trends specified from their diets? OF COURSE NOT!
How can we expect people to take a look at their own diets if suggestions are not offered? Sure, anyone reading this can realize that they have to cut sugar from their diets. But, other than cutting back the sugar poured in one’s coffee and laying off cookies, do you think the average person knows what to look for on a nutrition label to seek out the added sugar? I’d say “no”. Heck – I find this stuff so interesting and I still get completely confused and wonder if my pineapple Chobani is worth the extra sugar splurge.
We need to EDUCATE our society, as opposed to telling people that certain things are “good” and “bad”. We must begin by creating an emphasis on REAL food and then tackle processed foods one group at a time, highlighting the companies that work hard to provide convenient health food and pointing out the ones that offer little-to-no nutritional significance (NuVal, anyone?!?)
If money were no object, I would travel the country and speak at schools nationwide. I would invite parents to my talks (two birds with one stone) and focus on how the proper food can help one’s body run like a fine-tuned machine. This is basically my dream job. However, this would be quite difficult when the “experts” on health can’t seem to come to an agreement on sugar, cholesterol, etc ,etc. I feel as though I could speak to students and confidently say, “Apples are healthy”. And, that’s about it.
Okay, a bit dramatic, but that’s how I feel. Every day, there seems to be a new “trend” or “fad” associated with eating well. It’s ridiculous! It’s not difficult to see why eating well is confusing!
The government does a fine job with My Pyramid, but it’s not advertised like the crazy articles I’m always reading! First, egg yolks were bad for your cholesterol and now they’re okay again. Even this sugar article reads, “The Institute of Medicine recommends no more than 25 percent of total energy from added sugars; the World Health Organization recommends less than 10 percent; and the American Heart Association has recently advised no more than 100 calories per day for women and 150 calories per day for men, which works out to about 5 percent.”
It appears as though no one can determine how much sugar is too much. I searched My Pyramid’s site, as I believe they hold the most weight in matters such as this. Honestly, I couldn’t find any recommendation other than to keep unhealthy fats and sugars at the “top” of your pyramid, i.e. use them sparingly. To top this off, My Pyramid describes added sugars in this list. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t help me identify if my pineapple Chobani is loaded with sugars because it doesn’t take the time to identify what the average amount of natural sugar is in a yogurt.
Granted, this is probably on the milk page, but how many people are going to take the time to look this up? Even I’m too lazy! I propose My Pyramid create a “cheat sheet” of sorts that they advertise via a press release. I’m sick and tired of hearing from all of these other studies, which can never seem to get their facts straight. I want to hear from my GOVERNMENT, as opposed to individual studies.
Lastly, I’d like to touch on the fact that this article mentions low-income persons as being the worst “sugar offenders.” Truthfully, I’m sick of hearing that people with low-incomes have a worse diet than those that don’t. WHY do we keep discussing this as fact instead of a solution to fix the problem? Rather than reiterating the fact that healthy food is costly and food stamps (assuming these folks use them) barely buy a day’s worth of food (it breaks my heart), we need to TAKE ACTION if we expect the problem to get better.
I think the current White House is on the right track. First Lady, Michelle Obama, is working hard to introduce better foods in our schools and get kids moving. This keeps me hopeful that if kids aren’t getting the right stuff at home, they might be getting it at school in the future. However, I don’t think this is enough. I’d love to see “community gardens” similar to a CSA, but “of the people, by the people, for the people” (NAME THAT QUOTE!). I would love to see community gardens that sell fresh produce at discounted prices to those in lower-income areas. Perhaps they already exist, but I don’t know of any. (American Community Garden Association does exist, but they appear to mostly plant flowers in urban areas, as opposed to food. I did a quick search of my area and, apparently, an elementary school near Boston has a veggie garden, but the profile hasn’t been updated since 2007 so I’m not sure if that’s true.)
If you’re still here and read all of that, I thank you. I know I tend to go off on certain topics, but I’m a firm believer in discussing all issues, no matter how small. Granted, this is kind of a one-way street, but I’d love to hear your opinions in the comments section! This exact freedom of speech is exactly what makes America such a fantastic place to live, as it gives us the forum to bounce ideas and frustrations back-and-forth. This has become the foundation of every great idea in history. If we allow a topic to go silent, then we are truly accepting it as part of reality and I refuse to let that be the case with our health!
I’ll leave you with a much lighter topic: My food! I didn’t eat anything out of the norm today, so I’ll simply leave you with pictures
Breakfast: Scrambled egg beaters with whole wheat english muffin (topped with ICBINBL and Polaner all-fruit strawberry spread)
Lunch: Southwestern Stuffed Pepper (even better reheated!), strawberries and grapes
Snack:
Dinner: Reheated some lasagna I had stashed in the freezer (Still SO good…Love freezing meals!) with roasted broccoli
I roasted my broccoli at 375 for 30 minutes. This makes them SUPER crispy. I envision that this is what kale chips are supposed to taste like minus the putrid stem. I will try those again soon and will remove all stems!
One last thought before I go (other than GO BRUINS!): If you ever write me a comment with a question in it, be sure to check it again because I do try to answer them all!
Question of the day: Would you volunteer at a community garden if you knew it was helping those who were less fortunate than you?









